Dear visitor, this is a machine-translated article. It makes perfect sense in its original language (Czech), and is fully backed by independent scientific literature. The translation, though, is far from perfect and takes patience and imagination, if you decide to read it.

Drobečková navigace

Concomitant use of ginseng and glans (cancer)

Hello, I have a question, if you can recommend the use of glossy gloss and ginseng right at the same time. Thanks for your reply.

Sincerely, Jan V.

Dear Mr. Jane!

Your query was a bit difficult for me, and I had to ask the relevant authorities in the TČM research for his answer. I have confirmed my original view that from the point of view of common (ie scientific) pharmacology, there is no interference between ginseng and glossy barriers.

Ginseng and glossy can be combined without any problems

Preparations containing a mixture of ginseng and glans have no good reputation. This does not mean that ginseng and glossy shiny can not be combined - on the contrary, their present use is often very desirable. Typically, it is necessary for many different types of cancer , where gloss is recommended to fight the tumor itself , while ginseng helps to regenerate the immune system damaged by chemotherapy or radiotherapy that doctors will use for most cancers. In these cases, you will do best if you do not rely on mixed formulations, but you can get especially high-quality ginseng and especially glossy cork (preferably fructose powder, spice preparations and mycelium are less effective). You can take them at the same time.

Respect your doctor MUDr. And doctors

Finally, I would like to point out that in the treatment of specific illness you must always consult MUDr. Doctor. Tell him also about his intention to use TČM plants. Although the medicinal plants of TČM are not part of our regular curriculum, the more enlightened doctors are willing to supplement their expertise. As for the doctors of the TC, those with the difficulty of their studies are equal to the doctors of MUDr., But taxonomically, they rank among the magicians - if you find a real doctor of TČM and you entrust to his care, you have to obey his instructions no matter what I say and science in general .


Thank you for the reaction. I've tried it twice and I'm not having trouble. Personally, I would be interested in some people's experience with a glossy eye. I would also like to welcome a tip to a TCM expert with whom I could consult the matter. Sincerely, JV

Hello again. Glossy is strange in that you do not feel its effect subjectively. In particular, patients with glabra have overcome malignant cancer. Such cases are known more often, for example: HER2 + breast cancer: Medicinal fungi and ginseng , continued: HER2 + breast cancer 2: Other effective plants and fungi , HER2 + breast cancer 3 . This patient has overcome the worst stage of HER2 positive breast cancer and is still doing well (kissing)

As for the TCM centers, I will try to find out ...


Hello. The only thing about an oncology experience is, "Do what you want to do if you think it will help you." But the study did not prove anything like this, and it is true that some preparations can damage your health if it is unfortunate ... " But when he asks a doctor what to do with him ... he meets with total skepticism, which does not really make a person feel better. Sincerely, Jan V.

As writes the amazing John Virapen , 80% of biomedical researchers are paid by pharmaceutical corporations. Of course, in their studies, they will not demonstrate the effectiveness of what their breeders do not own. These biomedical sophists naturally ignore a priori. If studies from 20% of independent scientists appear, they are ignored or questioned. Only traditional means in this environment have a chance to scientifically defend. Oncologists are also just people and stand here as individuals against organized falsification of scientific information.

If today's science of natural medicines were concerned, we might have hundreds of effective newly discovered cheap cancer drugs. But that's not the case. The most effective thing that we know about cancer in the past is what our ancestors have known - glossy gloss and other anti-cancerous sponges . Glossy glamor is definitely one of the drugs whose cancer potential can not be doubted. Unlike cytostatics, it is harmless and in most cases the patient's outlook improves significantly.

I have to say that the skepticism of oncologists I understand to some extent. In their practice, oncologists rarely encounter patients trying to study their subjects lightly, and then frustrated by their attempt to interfere with therapy without being a fraction of the knowledge and experience of a professional oncologist. The despair that a part of the racist is forfeiting is also being abused by a number of cheaters - for example, the case of amygdalin / laetril / vitamin-B17 , which I guarantee as a physiologist, that it does not work and can not work (except placebo). Metabolic arguments about the alleged efficacy of amygdalin are totally destitute.

In conclusion, I would just like to point out that although traditional Chinese medicine itself is a paravedical discipline, and therefore from our point of view "alternative", anti-cancerous fungi are already relatively well researched and from the point of view of our medicine, they are lege artis means of treating cancer in parallel with chemotherapy Radiotherapy.

Similar question: Concomitant use of ginseng and glans (immunity)


| 27.7.2011

Related articles