I love the taste of coffee, and I'm a caffeine-maker who practically can not get out of coffee. But that would not be a problem if caffeine was beneficial or neutral. In this forthcoming article, I would like to discuss the extent to which and, if so, the reasons why it would be necessary to limit my personal caffeine intake.
Under old good totalitarian times in the CSSR, caffeine and camphorizing for unhealthy luxury like smoking did. Caffeine was thought to be stress and blood pressure- enhancing stimulant that was not indicated without serious reasons and which doctors like to ban older people .
Today the situation has turned and the negative properties of caffeine have disappeared from the radar. Parallel with this, cofferic bombs appeared in the form of energy drinks. Together with my caffeineism, this leads me to the question if I am not witnessing a business-evolutionary phenomenon, whose overall impact on society and also my personal health is negative. However, this is not the case as a conclusion. There are many small phytochemicals that are profoundly beneficial - for example, antioxidant coffee acid. Caffeine is suspected, however, that it is very similar to the nucleotide base of adenine, which is ubiquitous in biochemistry and, in addition, is involved in DNA.
Caffeine demonstrably enhances mental alertness and alertness , but makes an allosteric effect on adenosine receptors that over time desensitize, require higher doses, and cause causality after abortions of caffeine - abnormal drowsiness and other symptoms.
Filing this article will require further study of literature.