Hello, I have read in the questions (on Ariadne.cz) about the treatment of hypertension. But your answer is not there, so I would be glad if you sent me the answer you gave the lady. My doctor is probably a faithful copy of the doctor's interviewer. I'm also looking for natural products for high-pressure treatment before I swallow chemical drugs. Unfortunately I have not been successful yet. Thank you for your early reply. BN
Hello Mrs. N.
I was prompted to ask you for the treatment of hypertension. I get a response somewhat later, which I apologize for.
Hypertension and civilization diseases are at least one of the main domains of adaptogen, especially the model adaptogen, which is ginseng right . An article on this topic can be found here: Ginseng causes vascular extensions and lower blood pressure .
I have responded to several hypertonic questions on adaptogeny.cz. Specifically, hypertension involves questions:
I hope that you will be satisfied with my response over the delay.
Thank you for your email. I bought a manic-ginseng tablet from Natures Bounty in the pharmacy where they say the capsule contains a fresh root extract. One capsule has 250 g. Now that I have read all the information from you, so I feel I have reached the next. Please, can you answer me.
During the search on the Internet, I found information about the Chinese caterpillar and its effect is almost the same as that of the leskokorka you are writing about. Please, can you answer me. Thanks in advance for the information. I'm glad you did the time for me. Thanks again. BN
Dear Mrs N.!
Pharmaceutical forms such as capsules generally have their advantages, but in ginseng capsules, in particular, it is a key disadvantage that you can not visually assess what the contents are inside. Taking the capsule also usually causes an insufficient dosage of ginseng, where the ginseng leaves the patient with "not acting". This is what I wrote in my Commentary on ginseng products
The 250mg ginseng capsule is totally inadequate
Of course, 250mg of the capsule is totally inadequate, at least a reasonable dose should be taken by the patient at least ten times a day. In the EU, there is also a totally unreasonable regulation to limit the maximum recommended daily allowance to 2g, which it deserves only to ignore, just like other regulations on the harmfulness of the juvenile Siesta Squid (because it competes with saccharin), the Sacred Pacific Pig (which represents a healthier alternative to sleeping pills) etc.
With slices of 6-year-old ginseng TaiwanTCM Liang of Ariadne.cz I have a personal experience (because I once helped them to choose). If this 6-year-old ginseng does not take you, then you will know that ginseng does not handle your problems. If you do not take ginseng capsules, you do not know anything.
Knowing the effect (or ineffectiveness if it does not work) of a genuine 6-year ginseng will then allow you to judge separately other ginseng products, such as the Korean granulated tea, which you ask in another mail of September 25, which I answer. For ginseng , unlike other adaptogens (such as glossy glossy lenses ), the patient has the chance to judge the strength of the product to a certain extent, but it must start at really high doses to let the patient know what subjectively observable changes a ginseng's expectation is Mainly mental activation, and in men also improved erection ).
Comparison of glossy glossy and Chinese caterpillar
With rogue, careless and selling writers, unfortunately, reliable information can not be sought just "on the Internet". The first step is to select reliable authors. Such as Prof. Ing. Pavel Valíček, DrSc. In his just published book, "Mushrooms and their curative effects", the Chinese caterpillar has a whole range of positive health effects, many of which, just as you write, really resemble the effects of glossy glossy, long described in the same book. But this is a popular science book and I, as a scientist, do not have the right to drive it. It is my duty to write conservatively so that physicians, patients and those interested in the preventive and adaptogenic effects of these fungi can safely guide what I write. So my answer to this question will be a little dull, but I hope it will still satisfy you:
Chinese caterpillar is a sponge that is highly valued in TČM . Traditional Chinese medicine is not unscientific and it is therefore unlikely that the Chinese caterpillar would be therapeutically totally worthless. I would therefore like to agree with the inclusion of Chinese caterpillars among medicinal sponges . But I do not have her effects from primary sources and I can not believe the popular sources.
With glossy gloss, I have been irrefutably assured of having anticancer effects on many types of cancer . Glossy glossy I can and should recommend to oncologists, oncology patients and people with an increased risk of cancer. The other reported effects of glossy glossy luster are not sufficiently studied from primary sources and can not believe popular sources. However, I would like to argue that at least some of the (non-oncological) effects of glans will be realistic at least due to the content of effective ganoderic acids. Lesklokorka therefore very likely deserves to be included among adaptogens with an efficiency greater than small.
Otherwise, I do not know that I have not studied the Chinese caterpillar, it does not mean I have not read any scientific article about it - I've read a lot of them. But I do not have the right to trust the primary resources blindly and I need to judge their correctness and weight. More specifically, I can say that the Chinese caterpillar I have studied in part, but not so that I can not shame and with 100% confidence in my conclusions about its healing publicly.